• Mobile Friendly Smooth Stone

  • Tag Cloud

  • The Religion of Peace

  • Categories

  • Welles Remy Crowther

  • Days Until Obama Leaves Office

  • NOBama

  • NOBama Sites

  • Archives

  • Administration

Nov 30 2009

Salahi: What’s in a name?

Posted by smoothstone

Nothing other than that Tareq Salahi, the White House “gatecrasher”, served in the same anti-Israel group as Obama’s palestinian professor pal Rashid Khalidi, a professor who excuses muslim terrorism as long as it is Jewish blood, guts and sinew that get splattered. Via WND:

Tareq Salahi served on the board of the American Task Force for Palestine, where Columbia University Professor Khalidi served as vice president. The American Power blog noticed both Salahi’s and Khalidi’s names have been scrubbed from the Task Force website, although Salahi’s bio still comes up on a Google cache search of the site.

The Task Force lobbies for a Palestinian state and demands the so-called right of return for Palestinian “refugees” – a formula Israeli officials across the political spectrum have warned could destroy Israel by population genocide, with the Jewish state forced to accept millions of Arabs, thus diluting its Jewish majority.

Basically, this proves that when you lay down with dogs, you wake up with fleas.

Nov 17 2009

Video: Obama Admits He Is a Muslim

Posted by smoothstone

In this sterling video compilation, Obama glorifies and praises Islam, defends Islam, declares America to be a Muslim nation, bows before a Muslim king, appears in traditional Muslim dress, visits a mosque in Turkey, sides with Islam, embellishes the contributions that Islam has made to civilization, quotes from the Koran in a perfect Arabic accent and craftily avoids saying directly but admits in a round-about way that he comes from a family of generations of Muslims.  His most chilling comment appears at 9:31 minutes into the video, where he states in Arabic, that he “is one of them”.

No wonder the trial of the Muslim mass murderers who killed 3,000 people on 9-11 is  being held in NYC.  What better place for barbarians to mock the nation, people, state and non-Shariah government of the United States than from the witness stand where you are innocent until proven guilty.

As Scott W. Johnson states in a post on his PowerlineBlog,

No reason of law or justice, history or tradition, supports the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. in federal court. Indeed, as Thomas Sowell observes, it is something of an obscenity.

The cost of cloaking Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. with the constitutional protections afforded American citizens comes at a steep price. John Yoo spelled it out in painful detail in the Wall Street Journal yesterday: “Trying KSM in civilian court will be an intelligence bonanza for al Qaeda and the hostile nations that will view the U.S. intelligence methods and sources that such a trial will reveal.”

Let’s just hope that Ron Kuby is not hired as the mass murderer’s defense lawyer because we know that the first thing Kuby will do, will ask if Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was read the Miranda Act…

Nov 13 2009

Obama Sends Alleged Sept. 11 Mass Murderers to New York Court

Posted by smoothstone

Waleed bin Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi and Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali — are accused of orchestrating the attacks that killed 2,973 people on Sept. 11, 2001. And now they will be accorded privileges given to American citizens because the Obama administraton has decided to try the mass murderers in a civilian court – as common criminals – instead of in a tribunal court just so that he can push his Muslim Outreach agenda.

To all the stooges, dupes, schmucks, Jews-in-name-only, left-wingers, democrats and racists who voted for Obama in spite of his inexperience, his hype, his talkspeak, his pernicious associations and documented friendships with left-wing progressives, anarchists, anti-Americans, Jew-haters and communist leaders, then the injustice and miscarriage of justice for the war crimes against the murdered 2,973 fall on your shoulders.

Read more here and here. If you’re not disgusted by this outrageous decision by Barack Hussein Obama, then you’re simply too dumb to know why you should be.

Nov 06 2009

Obama’s Frightening Insensitivity Following Shooting

Posted by smoothstone

Robert George wrote about it and I too was stunned.

If anyone watched Obama’s press conference yesterday regarding the mass murder of Americans at Ft. Hood’s army base, you were probably stunned as well.

I was outdone and frankly, embarrassed, by Obama’s loathsome and inappropriate behavior at the news about the mass murder of innocent American civilians that took place at Fort Hood. But I’m not surprised. Obama’s insincerity and fraudulent character have been apparent for three years now, ever since the Democrat party began to parade the inexperienced back-bencher as their new poster-boy.

Click here for required reading and watch the video below of our unpolished president. It’s truly an embarrassing display of disconnect and ineloquence.

Oct 14 2009

Obamacare: Daughter saves mother, 80, left by doctors to starve

Posted by smoothstone

This is the soft tyranny being imposed on Americans by Obama in the stealthly written Health bill written behind closed doors resulting in a 1,000-page, trillion-dollar Washington takeover which will slash a half-trillion dollars from seniors’ Medicare, add new taxes, raise premiums, and which Americans will be fined AND imprisoned for up to a year if they don’t buy into the US Gov’ts Obamacare plan.  That’s not freedom, Obama! That’s not reform, Obama!  That is tyranny!

Obamacare – coming soon to your family.   Welcome to the tyranny of Obama and the radical left Democrat party.  Via TimesOnline:

AN 80-year-old grandmother who doctors identified as terminally ill and left to starve to death has recovered after her outraged daughter intervened.

Hazel Fenton, from East Sussex, is alive nine months after medics ruled she had only days to live, withdrew her antibiotics and denied her artificial feeding. The former school matron had been placed on a controversial care plan intended to ease the last days of dying patients.

Doctors say Fenton is an example of patients who have been condemned to death on the Liverpool care pathway plan. They argue that while it is suitable for patients who do have only days to live, it is being used more widely in the NHS, denying treatment to elderly patients who are not dying.

Fenton’s daughter, Christine Ball, who had been looking after her mother before she was admitted to the Conquest hospital in Hastings, East Sussex, on January 11, says she had to fight hospital staff for weeks before her mother was taken off the plan and given artificial feeding.

Ball, 42, from Robertsbridge, East Sussex, said: “My mother was going to be left to starve and dehydrate to death. It really is a subterfuge for legalised euthanasia of the elderly on the NHS. ”

Fenton was admitted to hospital suffering from pneumonia. Although Ball acknowledged that her mother was very ill she was astonished when a junior doctor told her she was going to be placed on the plan to “make her more comfortable” in her last days.

Ball insisted that her mother was not dying but her objections were ignored. A nurse even approached her to say: “What do you want done with your mother’s body?”

On January 19, Fenton’s 80th birthday, Ball says her mother was feeling better and chatting to her family, but it took another four days to persuade doctors to give her artificial feeding.

Fenton is now being looked after in a nursing home five minutes from where her daughter lives.

Peter Hargreaves, a consultant in palliative medicine, is concerned that other patients who could recover are left to die. He said: “As they are spreading out across the country, the training is getting probably more and more diluted.”

Oct 09 2009

Obama, the “Occupation” and the Six-Day War

Posted by smoothstone

In spite of the fact that Arabs have been slaughtering Jews since the late 1880’s, Barack Hussein Obama blames Israel for the 1967 “occupation” even though Israel was attacked first in a coordinated aggression that started when Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran and Arab armies amassed on Israel’s borders to invade and liquidate the state.

The West Bank and Gaza, which were controlled by Jordan and Egypt from 1948 to 1967 came under Israeli control only during the Six Day War of 1967 and it is important to note that during their 19-year rule, neither Jordan nor Egypt made any effort to establish a Palestinian state on those lands. Israel has, in fact, returned most of the land that it captured during the 1967 war and right after that war offered to return all of it in exchange for peace and normal relations; the offer has been rejected multiple times.

The land that Obama calls Palestine is formerly a part of Jordan.  Sixteen years after the founding of the state of Israel and three years before the Six Day War in 1967, Fatah was founded in 1964 with Arafat as one of its founding members.  Unless causality has no meaning, the ongoing war against Israel was born with no reference to 1967 but, rather, with Jews living in their own indigenous homeland and Israel’s re-birth in 1948.

The fact that Jews in the British Mandate have been attacked by Arabs since the early 1900’s -  was not because of any territorial dispute – but is because Jews exist.

In fact, Arabs themselves are occupiers in the Middle East – Arabs belong in Arabia and have no right to Egypt, Syria, Jordan, or Lebanon, so Obama needs to be corrected and reminded that Judea, Samaria and Gaza are not Israeli-occupied territory but Arab-occupied territory.

With the exception of Egypt, all the countries of the Middle East are artificial creations. After World War I, England and France carved up the Ottoman Empire, with England retaining what are now Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Israel and Iraq, and France being in possession of what are now Syria and Lebanon.

But because Obama has Muslim roots, he will keep diapering and bottle feeding palestinians and will never admit that palestinians are not exactly chained to their homicide belts and kassam rockets.

Obama needs to answer this:

If Israel is responsible for Muslim wrath, please explain what Israel did to encourage Syria to swallow Lebanon, to encourage Saddam Hussein to unleash a bloodbath against Iran, to encourage Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait, to encourage Kuwait to expel hundreds of thousands of “palestinians”, to encourage the Taliban to destroy the Bamiyan Buddha statues in Afghanistan, to encourage the slaughter of Christians in the Sudan, to encourage the bombings in Bali that killed 202 people, to encourage church bombings in Pakistan, or to blow up 200 Indians on the railroad system in Bombay.

The oft-repeated Arab claim that the Israeli ‘occupation’ is somehow to blame for being the root cause of palestinian terrorism is nothing more than an empty retort, repudiated by the facts, and disproved by a century of historical reality.

Obama needs to learn about the longest running war, the war of
hatred that Arabs have perpetrated upon Jews including the 1929 Hebron Massacre when Arabs shot and murdered 66 innocent Jewish men, women and children while praying in a synagogue in Hebron, before there was an “occupation”.

To those of us disgusted with the demonization of Israel, the Nazification of
Zionism, the politicization of all things Israeli, the Arab oversimplification reducing all discussions of Israel to the “palestinian problem”,
we have assholes like Obama telling us how to think, feel, react, emote,
and otherwise curl up and go submissive, while he sprinkles his
speeches with historical revisionism in foreign countries.  What a detestable fraud he is.

There is nothing more disgusting than Muslims who de-legitimize non-Muslims.

The fact of the matter is that it’s not Israel that causes MidEast unrest, it’s Islam.  Islam is unhinged.  It is the global Muslim rejection of Israel’s right to exist and not Israeli policies that are the cause of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

How detestable that we have a president, a World Citizen, who denies how mohammedans are ethnically cleansing Gaza, Lebanon and TransJordan of the indigenous Jews from their ancient homeland of Israel with genocidal Muslim zombies raised on milk from their mother’s breast full of hatred for the infidel.

It’s too bad that Obama’s own Muslim identity politics interferes with his ability to know facts and history.  But that’s who America elected.  It is outrageous in the extreme that the US has a president that accepts a scheme that would permit Arabs to have an ethnically cleansed geographical region where no Jews can live.

Thank goodness for two-term presidential limits.

Via JPost:

President Obama’s speech at the UN, with its reference to ending “the occupation that began in 1967,” implies, perhaps unintentionally, that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank is the cause of the Arab-Israeli conflict. This clearly inverts cause and effect. Terrorist activities against Israel had started years before the “occupation,” and the PLO, committed to the destruction of the Jewish state, was founded in 1964.

On May 13, 1967, the Egyptian dictator Gamel Abdel Nasser announced that two Egyptian divisions would move into the Sinai Peninsula bordering on southern Israel – contrary to international agreements, U.S. commitments and UN guarantees. Shortly after, Cairo announced that it would block all shipping to the port of Eilat, Israel’s only maritime outlet in the south, while Egyptian Mig21 war planes began flying over Israeli territory. Concurrently, Syrian and Iraqi forces were ordered to prepare for an assault on northern Israel. On May 30, King Hussein of Jordan signed a military agreement with Egypt’s Nasser, including a Jordanian commitment to join Egypt in any war with Israel. Its “Arab Legion” was put under Egyptian command.

The rest is history. Israel achieved complete victory in a war of legitimate self-defense against blatant aggression whose declared aim had been its obliteration. Successive American leaders declared that Israel should never be asked to go back to its former vulnerable borders. This is what 1967 is all about: not “ending” occupation, but making sure that Israel will never again be put in a situation like the one it faced in 1967.

Sep 26 2009

Handwritten note confirms the end of freedom in America

Posted by smoothstone

The Obama administration is out of control.  The Obama administration is going to force all of us to buy health insurance in Obama’s health care program, even when we don’t want it, and if we refuse to buy it, they will put us in JAIL.  We’ve been hearing this would be the case, but left-wing America has been covering it up.  Now we have proof from Sen. John Ensign that Obama’s goal to destroy freedom in America is well on the way.  Good job, Obamabots, for voting in the worst president since Jimmy Carter.

Via Politico:

This doesn’t happen often enough.

Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received a handwritten note Thursday from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold confirming the penalty for failing to pay the up to $1,900 fee for not buying health insurance.

Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty, Barthold wrote on JCT letterhead. He signed it “Sincerely, Thomas A. Barthold.”

The note was a follow-up to Ensign’s questioning at the markup.

Sep 06 2009

Van Jones resigns: Good riddance to bad rubbish

Posted by smoothstone

Van Jones has been forced to fall on his own sword and like the good Obama soldier that he is, he quit so as not to bring any more embarrassment to the already  failing presidency of Barack Hussein Obama.

This is good news.  Because as an admitted radical communist and black nationalist leader, his extremist history is bad for America. Van Jones WAS tapped to serve as the special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality. According to WND which first exposed Van Jones extremism five months ago,

Jones was a founder and leader of the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. That organization had its roots in a grouping of black people organizing to protest the first Gulf War. STORM was formally founded in 1994, becoming one of the most influential and active radical groups in the San Francisco Bay area.

STORM worked with known communist leaders. It led the charge in black protests against various issues, including a local attempt to pass Proposition 21, a ballot initiative that sought to increase the penalties for violent crimes and require more juvenile offenders to be tried as adults.

The leftist blog Machete 48 identifies STORM’s influences as “third-worldist Marxism (and an often vulgar Maoism).”

In another article on WND,

Jones was also linked late last week to efforts suggesting a government role in the Sept. 11 terror attacks and to derogatory comments about Republicans.

When the White House press corps grilled White House press secretary Robert Gibbs about Jones on Friday, a reporter asked how the administration could reject “conspiracy theories” about his birth certificate while employing someone who previously charged the U.S. government with masterminding Sept. 11.

Here are more articles on the communist/anarchist Van Jones to discuss around the water cooler when you return to work next week:

Text of Van Jones’ resignation letter
‘Opponents of reform have mounted a vicious smear campaign against me’
–Fox News

Van Jones looted during Rodney King riots
Arrested in San Francisco in 1992 while protesting police officers’ acquittals
–Fox News

Van Jones: Only white kids shoot up schools
‘You’ve never seen a Columbine done by a black child’
–Breitbart

Van Jones: U.S. was ‘apartheid regime’
Demands ‘theology of resistance, liberation’ to transform society
–WND

Van Jones mocks Bush as oil addict
‘Like a crackhead trying to lick the crack pipe for a fix’
–Breitbart

Bush may be behind 9/11, says Van Jones
Signed ‘truther’ statement organized by conspiracy website
–WND

Aug 21 2009

Is President Obama creating a civil war in our own country?

Posted by smoothstone

More astute observations about the state of America and Obama from Jon Voight.  Via Washington Times:

“There’s a real question at stake now. Is President Obama creating a civil war in our own country?” Mr. Voight tells Inside the Beltway.

“We are witnessing a slow, steady takeover of our true freedoms. We are becoming a socialist nation, and whoever can’t see this is probably hoping it isn’t true. If we permit Mr. Obama to take over all our industries, if we permit him to raise our taxes to support unconstitutional causes, then we will be in default. This great America will become a paralyzed nation.”

Be outraged, Mr. Voight advises.

“Do not let the Obama administration fool you with all their cunning Alinsky methods. And if you don’t know what that method is, I implore you to get the book ‘Rules for Radicals,’ by Saul Alinsky . Mr. Obama is very well trained in these methods,” he continues, citing a television campaign critical of the Republican Party and contentious town-hall meetings about health care reform.

“The real truth is that the Obama administration is professional at bullying, as we have witnessed with ACORN at work during the presidential campaign. It seems to me they are sending down their bullies to create fist fights among average American citizens who don’t want a government-run health care plan forced upon them,” Mr. Voight says. “So I ask again. Is President Obama creating a civil war in our own country?”

Aug 09 2009

U.S. No Longer at War with “Terrorism”

Posted by smoothstone

More mistruths, talkspeak, and disinformation from the Obama administration, culled no doubt, by Obama’s own Muslim identity politics.  Is there anyone out there that is non-Muslim that still remembers September 11th, 2001?  Via Washington Times:

The U.S. is no longer engaged in a “war on terrorism.” Neither is it fighting “jihadists” nor locked in a “global war.” It is now solely a “war with al-Qaeda” and its violent extremist allies, John Brennan, head of the White House homeland security office, said Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. To say the U.S. is fighting “jihadists” is wrongheaded, Brennan said, because it is using “a legitimate term, ‘jihad,’ meaning to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal,” which “risks giving these murderers the religious legitimacy they desperately seek but in no way deserve.” “Worse, it risks reinforcing the idea that the United States is somehow at war with Islam itself.”

As for the “war on terrorism,” Brennan said, the administration will not use the phrase “because terrorism is but a tactic – a means to an end, which in al-Qaeda’s case is global domination by an Islamic caliphate.”