Jordan, like all Arab nations that thrive on Muslim identity politics, wants to erase every shred of proof that Jews have an historical right to all the land in Israel, including the West Bank, Gaza and a little bit of the east side of the Jordan River. Via The Globe and Mail:

Jordan has asked Canada to seize the 2,000-year-old Dead Sea scrolls, on display at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto. While confirming that Canada has received a message from Jordan, a spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade said Thursday that “differences regarding ownership of the Dead Sea scrolls should be addressed by Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority. It would not be appropriate for Canada to intervene as a third party.” The ancient Hebrew scrolls, discovered in 1947, were part of one of the greatest archeological discoveries of the 20th century. The scrolls had been hidden in caves to hide them from the Romans. Israel argues that all the scrolls in its possession are part of the Jewish heritage.

For more critical evidence that negates the claim that the Arabs in the Land of Israel have been there “from time immemorial”, see this, this, this and this.

Mr. Shmuel Sokol, Center for Near East Policy Research, was recently commissioned by Daniel Pipes and his Middle East Forum to write a research report on the anti-Zionist and antisemitic Israeli-Arab NGO I’lam, which is largely funded by American Jewish donors and engages in spreading falsified claims of massacre and anti-Israel propaganda through its media outreach efforts.

Mr. Sokol’s articles on the matter can be found online at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=101992 (“American Jews fund anti-Israel organizations: Groups work with Palestinian Authority, promote Iran nukes”) and http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132047 (“New Israel Fund Grantee’s Video Accuses IDF of Executions”)

The New Israel Fund, which provides funding for core expenses and salaries at I’lam is regularly apprised of I’lam’s activities and continues to misrepresent I’lam as a progressive organization to their American donors, some of which have contacted the Center for Near East Policy Research in shock and disgust to confirm Mr. Sokol’s research.

Via Anti-Israel Protest Is Countered by Standing Ovation:

Protesters who interrupted a concert by Israeli musicians five times Friday sparked outrage – but the audience for the recital, by the Jerusalem Quartet as part of the Edinburgh International Festival, responded with a standing ovation. Five Scottish protesters stood up, one after another, at the concert in the Queen’s Hall to disrupt the performance, denouncing “Israeli army musicians,” before being bundled out and arrested. But the audience rallied to the musicians – two of whom are members of the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra, established to promote harmony between Israeli and Arab musicians and cultures.

Scotsman music critic Susan Nickalls called it “absolutely disgraceful…. Even if one might have sympathy with the Palestinian cause, this was not the platform. The audience had come to hear an uncontroversial program of Brahms, Smetana and Haydn, not the views of political activists.”

Kudos to JewishWorldReview’s Jonathan Mark for illuminating yet another of Barack Hussein Obama’s relationship with radical Muslim anti-Zionists, a subject that Obamaniacs in this country don’t want to discuss, mainly because they don’t want to acknowledge that they are part of the American Left which has been trying to strip this country of its Judeo-Christian heritage for the last half-century. Jonathan Mark writes:

The Los Angeles Times devoted a lengthy front-page story (April 10) by Peter Wallsten headlined, “Allies of Palestinians see a friend in Barack Obama. They consider him receptive despite his clear support of Israel.” The story was not picked up by any other American paper. It is rather unusual for a major daily to think a story worthy of front-page coverage and no other paper to share that assessment.

The story focused on Obama’s time as an Illinois state legislator, just five years ago, when he was friends, if not allied, with Rashid Khalidi, the vocal anti-Zionist professor at Columbia University who at the time was living in Obama’s Chicago district; Edward Said, the late anti-Zionist professor and member of the Palestinian Authority legislature; and Ali Abunimah, a resident of Obama’s district and editor of the Electronic Intifada online journal.

Wallsten writes, the Obama-Khalidi relationship “have left some Palestinian American leaders believing that Obama is more receptive to their viewpoint than he is willing to say.”

They base that belief on his presence at “events where anger at Israeli and U.S. Middle East policy was freely expressed,” not unlike those who wonder about Obama’s truest self after his relationship with Wright and his anger.

“I am confident that Barack Obama is more sympathetic to the position of ending the occupation than either of the other candidates,” said Hussein Ibish, a senior fellow for the American Task Force on Palestine, to Wallsten.

The foreign minister of Hamas has recently endorsed Obama for president, another story that has sunk like a stone, barely reported other than by Fox and a popular right-wing website, even though Sen. John McCain brought it up on the campaign trail.

In 1998, reports Wallsten, Obama attended a speech by Edward Said in which Said called for a nonviolent campaign “against settlements, against Israeli apartheid.” Later, Obama and his wife were photographed at dinner with Said. “If only Obama could burn this picture,” writes Al Ahram, but the Cairo paper printed the picture anyway.

Abraham Foxman, national director for the Anti-Defamation League, told the Los Angeles Times, “In the context of [Obama] spending 20 years in a church” where anti-Israel rhetoric was repeated, “that’s what makes his presence at an Arab-American event with a Said a greater concern.”

Wallsten reports that Abunimah of Electronic Intifada said he heard Obama call for an “even-handed approach” toward Israel. In 2004, when Obama was running for the Senate, Abunimah quoted Obama as saying that he was sorry he wasn’t talking more about the Palestinian cause, but that his primary campaign had constrained what he could say. (Obama told Jewish leaders in Cleveland recently that a pro-Israel position is not necessarily a pro-Likud one.)

And yet Wallsten’s story of Obama’s Palestinian-American support received almost no coverage beyond that. It was reprinted on a Fox TV Web site in Seattle and was mentioned in the Jordan Times.

Obama has not been asked about it in the debates, and in meetings with Jewish communities in Cleveland and Philadelphia, where he has been asked repeatedly about Wright’s relationship with Louis Farrakhan but not about his own relationship with Electronic Intifada.

(Obama’s Palestinian-American friendships have been reported in The Jewish Week on several occasions, the first time in 2007)

For more on historical revisionism regurgitated by Rashid Khalidi, see this.

For more on the dead Edward Said, see this.

For more on the fiercely hostile Ali Abunimah, see this.