<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coal official calls Obama comments &#8216;unbelievable&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smoothstoneblog.com/2008/11/coal-official-calls-obama-comments-unbelievable.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smoothstoneblog.com/2008/11/coal-official-calls-obama-comments-unbelievable.htm</link>
	<description>A content-rich information fact and opinion blog that advocates, educates, professes, affirms, defends and furnishes facts about the legitimate and sovereign nation of Israel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://smoothstoneblog.com/2008/11/coal-official-calls-obama-comments-unbelievable.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4933</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smoothstoneblog.com/?p=2357#comment-4933</guid>
		<description>Continued cause I forgot to state the money involved on the part of the industry

Nox emissions costs/ton
2005 (effectively none)
2008 $500/ton
2009 $6000/ton

a 500MW plant using (low emissions tech) produces about 25 tons/day thus costing the rate payers 150k/day or approx 1 mil a week

The state govt is blocking a proposed plant that will produce 800MW and only discharges about 5 tons/day, its 2 billion investment that is not comming out of the stimulus plan b/c its a sound investment. Why would obama, Dems block this preventing jobs in michigan where we are losing jobs rapidly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continued cause I forgot to state the money involved on the part of the industry</p>
<p>Nox emissions costs/ton<br />
2005 (effectively none)<br />
2008 $500/ton<br />
2009 $6000/ton</p>
<p>a 500MW plant using (low emissions tech) produces about 25 tons/day thus costing the rate payers 150k/day or approx 1 mil a week</p>
<p>The state govt is blocking a proposed plant that will produce 800MW and only discharges about 5 tons/day, its 2 billion investment that is not comming out of the stimulus plan b/c its a sound investment. Why would obama, Dems block this preventing jobs in michigan where we are losing jobs rapidly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://smoothstoneblog.com/2008/11/coal-official-calls-obama-comments-unbelievable.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smoothstoneblog.com/?p=2357#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>Working in the coal power plant I can tell a few things about baseline vs renewable energy.

Baseline is power that is always available nearly 100% of the time, this demand is vital to nearly everyone in the world that uses electricity for computer security, manufacturing capability, cold / cool food storage, or just about any other business / money producing entity.

Renewable energy is good for off setting peak demand due to thats usually when solar power is most viable (approx 2-6pm) while wind power is mostly viable at night when winds pick up due to differing high and low pressures b/c of uneven thermal heating of the earth from sun.

Renewable energy needs to be backed up nearly 100% (1mw baseline avail and offline for 1mw un-predictable renewable.) Coal, hydro, cogen, fuel oil/natural gas, and nuclear supply the baseline for the USA.  Coal power is nearly 58% of the power supplied in the US/Canada. 

That the Obama campaign would say this in the heart of coal country was not thought out on his part and probably should have cost him those states, I&#039;m not sure if it did but Many things they said should have cost them the election but the electoral college seems like it gives individuals a raw deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working in the coal power plant I can tell a few things about baseline vs renewable energy.</p>
<p>Baseline is power that is always available nearly 100% of the time, this demand is vital to nearly everyone in the world that uses electricity for computer security, manufacturing capability, cold / cool food storage, or just about any other business / money producing entity.</p>
<p>Renewable energy is good for off setting peak demand due to thats usually when solar power is most viable (approx 2-6pm) while wind power is mostly viable at night when winds pick up due to differing high and low pressures b/c of uneven thermal heating of the earth from sun.</p>
<p>Renewable energy needs to be backed up nearly 100% (1mw baseline avail and offline for 1mw un-predictable renewable.) Coal, hydro, cogen, fuel oil/natural gas, and nuclear supply the baseline for the USA.  Coal power is nearly 58% of the power supplied in the US/Canada. </p>
<p>That the Obama campaign would say this in the heart of coal country was not thought out on his part and probably should have cost him those states, I&#8217;m not sure if it did but Many things they said should have cost them the election but the electoral college seems like it gives individuals a raw deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
