First it was the Germans who dictated to us, and now for more than 60 years its the Arabs. This ugly document keeps resurfacing lately.

Who are the Arabs to dictate to Jews who we are, where we should live, what our borders are, what offends us, and where we belong?

There is no law on earth that requires the Jewish people to accept the revision of their history nor their own demise merely because Arabs or American Presidents say we should.

Arabs deceive the world and pretend that if Israel went back to pre 1967 borders there would be peace. But what happened in 1967 that caused the borders to change? Did Israel just decide they wanted more land or was Israel attacked, for the seventh time, by warmongering Arabs?

I’ve said it before and I’ll keep saying it: unlike the political Arabian Nation, the Zionist movement to Palestine/the Land of Israel represents a return, not an invasion.

It is the Palestinian rejection of Israel’s right to exist and not Israeli policies that are the cause of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It is not citizenship that the Palestinians want, nor do they want their own nation; instead they esteem a reactionary vision that would erase the “Nakba,” the “Catastrophe,” of Israel’s creation by eliminating the Jewish state.

I have solidified my belief that the only way for peace is that one side must go. A two-nation solution is mere mythology.

Besides, who decides what land is “Palestinian land”, the international community? If so, they have tried before. The Arabs were offered land and refused their offer in 1948 and attacked Israel in a pre-meditated war of barbaric aggression. Arabs chose war. Arabs suffer the consequences.

Why should any people who have attacked a legitimate and sovereign nation, instead of negotiating, be deserving of the victor’s consideration at all? There would be no issue today, if Arabs had been willing to share the land.

Tell me the truth, folks, if the combined Arab states had won that war in 1948, would they have benevolently pulled back so Jews could build a state? No one is that dumb.

Then again, we have Barack Hussein Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama intends to pursue a “peace” plan in the Middle East involving the recognition of Israel by the Arab world in exchange for its withdrawal to pre-1967 borders, according to sources close to America’s president-elect.

Obama intends to throw his support behind a 2002 Saudi peace initiative endorsed by the Arab League. 

The advisers have told Obama he should lose no time in pursuing the policy in the first six to 12 months in office while he enjoys maximum goodwill. So in order to guarantee his popularity, which is bound to go downhill once all of his devotees discover what a fraud he really is, Barack Hussein Obama will have to sacrifice Israel.

Here’s why this is a bad idea:

Palestiniasts don’t want to admit that they have never reconciled themselves to the establishment of a legitimate and sovereign Jewish state.

Palestiniasts don’t want to admit that the Palestinian Charter clearly calls for the destruction of Israel.

Palestiniasts don’t want to admit that there is NO occupation of Gaza anymore. Israel demolished whole communities and pulled each and every Israeli citizen out and redeployed all their forces outside the recognized boundries of Gaza territory. What there is now is an economic blockade. That happens in times of armed conflict and are NOT against international law.

Palestiniansts have been believing the hype too long.  The occupied territories are no longer occupied.

What Palestiniasts need to remember is next time, don’t attack a sovereign nation like you did in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, and ignite several dozen infitadas, because you’re going to lose.

What Palestiniasts should focus on are their own crimes against humanity they have committed by launching missiles over an international border into a sovereign state. See, the civilized world calls that an act of war. But double-standards and trickery are the mainstay of Arab politics.

It is outrageous to the extreme the extent with which the entire world refuses to accept the right of the Jewish people to live freely in their own land.

Now as background to the roadmap to destroy Israel, Barack Hussein Obama and his Jew-hating thugs are referring to UN Resolution 242 and the Saudi Peace Initiative.

The Saudi Peace initiative requires full Israeli withdrawal from “occupied Palestinian, Syrian and Lebanese land” in return for “full normalization of relations.” But Prince Turki al-Faisal, former Saudi ambassador to the US and UK added a refinement: If Israel signed a comprehensive peace, “one can imagine the integration of Israel into the Arab geographical entity.” He went on to say: “We will start thinking of Israelis as Arab Jews rather than simply as Israelis.”

This is just another wave of the relentless Arab assault on the Zionist ideal of a sovereign Jewish state in its ancestral homeland.  Besides, if implemented, the “Saudi Peace Initiative,” would strip Israel of defensible borders, push it back to the vulnerable 1967 lines, and redivide Jerusalem.

Today, the Palestinian Authority and Hamas have replaced the Arab states as claimants to the territories that Israel captured and that have been disputed since 1967.

There is no doubt that if Israel were to withdraw from its current positions, al-Qaeda and the rest of the Muslim world  that are infiltrating Lebanon, Gaza, and Jordan would seize the opportunity and unleash a wave of jihad attacks against Israel and her citizens.

After the Six Day War in 1967, after a pre-meditated war of aggression against Israel, Israel regained Jerusalem and other land west of Jordan. It was after the fighting that the UN Security Council then passed Resolution 242 authorizing Israel to remain in possession of all the land until it had “secure and recognized boundaries.”

The resolution was notably silent on Jerusalem, and also referred to the “necessity for achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem,” with no distinction made between Jewish and Arab refugees.

Here are the facts about 242:

Resolution 242 calls for:

• Recognition of Israel’s right to exist, an end to the state of war maintained by the Arab world against Israel and secure and recognized boundaries for Israel
• 242 does NOT require Israel to return to the non-secure borders of pre-1967

Arthur J. Goldberg, an author of U.N. Resolution 242, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations (1965-1967):

“It calls for respect and acknowledgment of the sovereignty of every state in the area. Since Israel never denied the sovereignty of its neighbouring countries, this language obviously requires those countries to acknowledge Israel’s sovereignty.”

“The notable omissions in regard to withdrawal are the word ‘the’ or ‘all’ and ‘the June 5, 1967 lines’… the resolution speaks of withdrawal from occupied territories, without defining the extent of withdrawal.”

Lord Caradon, an author of U.N. Resolution 242, U.K. Ambassador to the United Nations (1964-1970):

“We didn’t say there should be a withdrawal to the ‘67 line; we did not put the ‘the’ in, we did not say all the territories, deliberately… We all knew – that the boundaries of ‘67 were not drawn as permanent frontiers, they were a cease-fire line of a couple of decades earlier… We did not say that the ‘67 boundaries must be forever.” ~~ MacNeil/Lehrer Report – March 30, 1978

Eugene V. Rostow, U.S. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs (1966-1969):

“Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338… rest on two principles, Israel may administer the territory until its Arab neighbors make peace; and when peace is made, Israel should withdraw to ’secure and recognized borders’, which need not be the same as the Armistice Demarcation Lines of 1949.” ~~ “The Truth About 242″ - November 5, 1990

Lyndon B. Johnson, U.S. President (1963-1968):

“We are not the ones to say where other nations should draw lines between them that will assure each the greatest security. It is clear, however, that a return to the situation of June 4, 1967 will not bring peace.” ~~ September 10, 1968

What does 242 say?

• “Termination of all claims or states of belligerency… “

• “…respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political independence of every State in the area… “

• “…[every State's] right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.”

• “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories in the recent conflict.”

The Arab states must end the state of war initiated and maintained by them since 1948. The Arab states must recognize Israel’s right to exist.

Israel is entitled to clearly defensible borders.

This is not a privilege, but rather a right guaranteed by international law.

Israel should not withdraw from any territories captured in the 1967 Six-Day War.  The historical sequence of events on June 5, 1967, is critical, for Israel only entered the West Bank after repeated Jordanian artillery fire and ground movements across the previous armistice lines.

Jordanian attacks began at 10:00 a.m.; an Israeli warning to Jordan was passed through the UN at 11:00 a.m.; Jordanian attacks nonetheless persisted, so that Israeli military action only began at 12:45 p.m. Additionally, Iraqi forces had crossed Jordanian territory and were poised to enter the West Bank.

Under such circumstances, the temporary armistice boundaries of 1949 lost all validity the moment Jordanian forces revoked the armistice and attacked. Israel thus took control of the West Bank as a result of a defensive war.

Israel acquired the territories as a result of self-defense, not aggression. Therefore, Israel should not be punished for defending her own citizens.

Let’s face it.  Terrorism cannot be justified.

Barack Hussein Obama, by drinking from the cup of Muslim Identity Politics, has legitimized Terrorism.

By asking Israel to forfeit her borders, her sovereignty, her Holiest City, to her most dangerous enemy, is an unforgiveable sin.

If Barack Hussein Obama continues in his Islamdolatry - the adoration of Islamic belief, worship or culture -  it will be seen as an unforgivable transgression according to Judaism’s Foundations (eloquently stated by Maimonides -12th Century Egypt)

When one severs the relationship by idolatry, G-d is no longer a “Father” who is “merciful”.

One Response to “Barack Hussein Obama, Pan-Arabia, and their united efforts to destroy Israel”

1. David M Says:
   November 17th, 2008 at 12:17 pm

   The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - Web Reconnaissance for 11/17/2008 A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often.

Leave a Reply